- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 4,795
- Points
- 113
This is the last paragraph of an article written today. I would link it but i cant( you do the math)
It is next to impossible for fans or the media to properly evaluate a coordinator because so much of their success depends on the players. The calls the coordinators make are important, but not nearly as important as how the players perform. In football, strategy is important but not nearly as important as execution.
This is a bit of an over simplification.
WHY do some players/teams execute more frequently than others? That's really the point, isn't it?
Some fans seem to think it's all on the players and to some extent it is, but it's the coaches job to PREPARE the players and increase the chances the players execute correctly.
If a coach's game plan is too complex or is using plays that haven't been run or practiced since August or hops/skips around from week-to-week, wouldn't that increase the likelihood the players fail to execute?
There is a TON of variables to coaching, but one of the most important is to understand players aren't perfect and know which players you're stuck playing are most likely to "fail to execute" and try and reduce that from happening through game planning, play selection and practice time.
Anyone that thinks coaching is just pick plays and expect the players to execute it perfect and if not, it's the players' fault is looking at it completely *** backwards.