- Joined
- May 10, 2019
- Messages
- 1,837
- Reaction score
- 2,702
- Points
- 113
You seem to have jumped to the conclusion that I was comparing Jesus and X. In my lengthy post, I explained why I see X as a hero while saying I didn't agree with all of his preaching or methodologies.
Saying Jesus was a radical and X was a radical is fair, they just weren't the same type of radicals, nor was I indicating as such.
Google "was Jesus a radical."
He was. Just a very different type of radical than Malcolm.
Heck there's even a book you can buy called Jesus the Radical: https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Radical-Portrait-they-Crucified/dp/1573832367
I'd say that he was radical in that he had a perfect understanding of orthodoxy and the true intent of spirituality. That's established by statements such as "render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." He also was very careful to say "think not that I am come to destroy the prophets, but to fulfill." He even told the people to listen to the pharisees and bid and observe what they say because they sit in Moses's seat -- but do as they say and not as they do. Remember that they kept imploring him to throw off the yoke of Rome and he was clear that his intent was building a spiritual kingdom.
He was only radical to them because they themselves were so radically lost and undone but could not see it.
I think it's dangerous or at least shortchanges Christ when we make him a revolutionary somehow compared and contrasted with the Malcom's, Gandhi's, or Mandela's as if those men ever raised the dead or rose from the dead themselves.
Jesus himself put all the imperative in the universe on how we view him -- asking Peter "who do you (everyone's individual decision) say that I am?"
It's little like what Steve Turner wrote in his satirical poem on the modern mind entitled "Creed."
https://www.apuritansmind.com/apologetics/steveturnercreed/
(Excerpt)
Jesus was a good man just like Buddha,
Mohammed, and ourselves.
He was a good moral teacher though we think
His good morals were bad.
We believe that all religions are basically the same-
at least the one that we read was.
They all believe in love and goodness.
They only differ on matters of creation,
sin, heaven, hell, God, and salvation.
We believe that after death comes the Nothing
Because when you ask the dead what happens
they say nothing.
If death is not the end, if the dead have lied, then its
compulsory heaven for all
excepting perhaps
Hitler, Stalin, and Genghis Khan.."
There is an imperative to Jesus that rises above consideration of merely notable revolutionaries in history.
Contrast Obama telling antifa to "make your leaders very uncomfortable" and exacerbating an already bad situation. Jesus was no community organizer of that revolutionary, class struggle ilk. Obama isn't with him, so he's against him. Obama doesn't gather, he scatters abroad.
John said there were many antichrists already in the world. Barack Obama is a special case and even came with messianic trappings when he was foisted upon us. He's an antichrist.
Last edited: