You implied that I was making up what I said. I provided proof of my statement. You can admit you were wrong.
"Okay, the Mexican government is providing instructions to its citizens on how to enter the US illegally. Unaware of that, and it certainly does show the extent of the problem of illegal aliens entering our country."
Something like that would have been called for. Or maybe, "Huh, I thought you were making up the pamphlet thing, but I guess I was wrong," or "Hey, is Mexico still doing that" or "I can see why a lot of US citizens are fed up with illegals. Wow, a pamphlet, really?" Need more examples? Or is that enough?
I do - their answer, as evidenced by the past 50 years, is to encourage and support illegals to enter the country to change the demographic and generate more Democrat voters. Ted "Killer" Kennedy was a mover behind the immigration changes that brought vastly more immigrants from Asia and Latin America. His incentive was to change the Western United States. Kennedy looked at how population was booming in the West, and how at the time, the Western US was heavily Republican. He feared that the (D) party was relegated to the trash heap without a radical change, and he pushed that change in the form of massive changes to the immigration laws in 1965.
Those changes brought hundreds of thousands, and soon to be millions, of immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America. The immigration statutes also favored families of the immigrants ("chain migration"), a self-feeding process to bring in more immigrants from Latin America. And Kennedy's immigration approach worked - California went from arguably the most Republican state in the continental United States as of 1964 to a single-party state, dominated (and now being destroyed) by (D)umbasses.
Obama's immigration policy was simply to not return minors, supposedly for humanitarian reasons. So some of the worst of the worst south of the border took advantage of that, and "teamed up" with children who were not theirs and claimed to be a parent or guardian as a way to get into the country. By the by, as has been noted in this forum, approximately 2,300 children were separated from their parents - while more than 10,000 came to the country alone or in the company of rapists and human traffickers pretending to be their parents.
Nielsen answered by calling the US a "country of compassion" and then pointed out the 10,000 of the 12,000 children in care of Health and Human Services who she said had arrived to the US as unaccompanied minors.
http://www.businessinsider.com/chil...stjen-nielsen-family-border-separation-2018-6
Why was this happening? Because Obama was not deporting minors, so parents were sending their children - as young as 4 years old - by themselves to the United States. The theory was that since the children were not deported, if they remained in the US, then the parents would get the benefit of "chain migration" and join them later.
Yes, that is correct - parents were sending their 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12-year old children unaccompanied across thousands of miles to seek asylum so that the parents could then get a "ticket" to the United States. You think I'm making this up?
Chris Cabrera, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agent and spokesperson for the National Border Patrol Council, said Tuesday agents have seen girls coming across the border as young as 12 years old who are put on birth control “because they know getting violated is part of the journey." “When you see a 12-year-old girl with a Plan B pill or her parents put her on birth control because they know getting violated is part of the journey, that’s a terrible way to live,” Cabrera said. “When you see a four-year-old girl traveling alone with just her parents’ phone number written across her shirt. I mean, come on now, you know, something needs to be done.” Cabrera also told CNN about a 9-year-old boy who died of heat stroke last year “with no family around and that’s because we’re allowing people to take advantage of this system.”
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2018/06/19/border-patrol-immigration-plan-b-birth-control/
So Donald Trump is responsible, right? RIGHT? Not the parents, not the squalid and corrupt countries supporting the illegal immigration, not a policy that allowed illegal minors to remain, not a policy that established "chain migration," not Mexico for turning a blind eye towards the exodus of Central Americans across its border, not Mexico for encouraging illegal immigration. No, it's that evil ******, Trump.
Why just look at the cover of Time - what an *******!! Wait, that kid was not separated from mom, who thought it a good idea to illegally enter the US? And the entire image is a photoshopped phony? Never mind. It's still Trump's fault.
Wrong. Deport illegals, like every other nation on earth. Don't give illegals money - room, board, etc. - and as we have agreed, punish employers who hire illegals. Take away every financial incentive for illegals to enter our country. Problem solved.
Compared to the (D) approach of encourage and ignore.
Huh? You think what I wrote is confrontational? I countered the points you raised. I did not name-call at all. I provided very specific facts, including links, with what I say.
That's not "confrontational," it's factual.
