I am not saying that it is a “sound” strategy, just that it is the way they operate. In this cases, I agree with them, you get 5 years for a reason. At this point I truly consider KP still a rookie, since he was saddled with Tomlin/Canada. I would Draft 24 (year 3) as if KP was your guy going forward, and get those foundational players now. IF progress is shown in 24, then draft again in 25 as if he is the guy (year 4) and get more foundation and supporting players. This then makes 26 the year to go QB early if needed. The difference is that then you have built the foundation to grow on.
This is true, but what QB draft history, do the Steelers show being better at? They don’t, the difference is they don’t give up right away.
You always WANT a QB, but sometimes you NEED something else.
Looking to improve a position through the draft is the right way to go, I agree. But we disagree on the priorities of positions overall.
This is pure speculation at this point. Not saying you are going to be proven wrong, just that it is speculation.