- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 15,544
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Points
- 113
Ike Taylor was more raw than Burns..
Ike was much more physical too, and you know what he went in round four where a gamble makes sense. Burns at age 20 went in is round one...
Ike Taylor was more raw than Burns..
People have short memories. He won't pan out. HAHA!
Common knowledge equates to prophecy. And speculation is the truth in his mind.
We all knew this was coming...
Troy Edwards, Ricardo Colclough, Scot Shields, Shamarko Thomas
HA HA!
The steelers would have been crazy to take Billings with the way the draft unfolded. 6 DBs were off the board when the steelers took Burns. Meanwhile, there were fewer DL drafted than expected. DL was already very deep and now you have guys like Billings, Reed, Robinson, Dodd are all still available. That means that there's still going to be quality available later.
Burns may have the ability to become an average CB in time. But most of his value is in potential, not as he sits now. Most had
him graded as a 3rd-4th round pick, based solely on potential, but he is raw and will not make the field his rookie year. He has size,
length and decent speed but can be picked on and loses his confidence. There were probably about 40 players, left on the board, who
would have been better picks than Burns was here.
144th rated guy in the draft by PFF and we take him 25th. Don't like it. Hope I'm wrong, but really don't like it.
Maybe. Last year to me was average defense.
2015: Good Offense + Average Defense = 11-5 season
2014: Good Offense + Bad Defense = 8-8 season
2013: Average Offense + Average Defense = 8-8 season
I sort of suspect another Good Offense + Average Defense again and likely another 10-12 win season.
If we can ever get the defense to be good (maybe even for a spurt at the right time), I think that leads to the potential of a deep playoff run. Until then, average might be good enough for playoffs, but not much more.
Right. We could have had Alexander and 3rd round pick or Burns.
We could have had Billings and a third round pick or Burns.
And Burns could have been there at #31, we can't say for sure.
the last time we took a db in the first that coach didnt like, that dude turned out pretty good. pollymollyloo or something.
If you think Burns is comparable to Troy in any way, you need to get out of the sun, or have a cup of coffee. 1.) They don't play the same position, at all, and, 2.) TP was a complete freak of nature; Burns isn't really special at all, in any area. He's not that big, he's not that fast (4.46 forty is below average for an NFL CB), he's not strong at all (7 reps of 225), he is not focused, plays with too high a center of gravity. Purely valued for potential, and you don't use a 1st round pick on potential. I really wonder what Tolbert are thinking sometimes.
If you think Burns is comparable to Troy in any way, you need to get out of the sun, or have a cup of coffee. 1.) They don't play the same position, at all, and, 2.) TP was a complete freak of nature; Burns isn't really special at all, in any area. He's not that big, he's not that fast (4.46 forty is below average for an NFL CB), he's not strong at all (7 reps of 225), he is not focused, plays with too high a center of gravity. Purely valued for potential, and you don't use a 1st round pick on potential. I really wonder what Tolbert are thinking sometimes.
My feeling is that the pick goes exactly against what the majority here have said. Don't go with a project. This team isn't in a project player situation. Window closing. Go with safe and ready to play. The other point is that when the majority of people approve of the pick it usually goes well. I would say with the exception of Mendenhall which was a fairly consensus pick. Conversely, when people are gowning like Hood and Jarvis it has not gone well. With the exception of Timmons, but he was a long term project that looked bust for two years too.
Other point. They haven't reached in a few years. Here they went with the last guy who has first round measurables. But he was the guy without first round tape. Artie Burns could be a great player. I just think there are too many different ways this could have gone, that would be far safer.
Meh, I think he can be good, but also could be a project... he was a quiet climber on a lot of boards, and the clear cut better CB prospects were off the table. i like his Bump and run ability.Not appalled, but somewhat less than stoked about it
When are these fools going to get it: You don't use a first round pick on someone who hasn't really shinned in terms of already having quality on tape/results. That is what round 7 is for. Could they luck out with burns? They could. But you use the Jimmy Johnson/Big Tuna philosophy which is prior playing success trumps all else, including combine #s. Prior production is the Holy Grail; nothing trumps it. But they went for "potential" over all else here.