Williams ain't on your list??? Tom Foolery!!!
we have enough pot heads on our team.....
Williams ain't on your list??? Tom Foolery!!!
Williams ain't on your list??? Tom Foolery!!!
Are you really pointing to his 12 career passes defensed as a metric for his coverage ability? Well, hell, might as well go with Tyler Matakavich then, since he had 7 career INTs and 11 career passes defensed. He must be a coverage monster. Why not Jordan Evans of Oklahoma, bigger, faster, 5 INTs and 16 PDs in his career. Or Jayon Brown (3 INs and 12 PDs).
And, you have NO clue what I am looking for. Why? Because I have not written it on a website for you to read and use.
Please TMC,
Rudy is short and slow. Walker is a bit faster and better suited for coverage.
How's Phillip Rivers doing? IF you remember you felt he was a bust, I felt he would be a very good NFL Player.
Guess who was correct?
<<<<<
TMC - thoughts on Trevor Knight?
I've seen him being mentioned as only a late draft pick or not at all.
my question is why.
is this analysis on nfl.com legit? i saw him play a few times and he may not be accurate, but dude's a winner.
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/trevor-knight?id=2558267
Analysis
Strengths
Looks the part with a muscular, athletic build. Has the ability to hurt teams with his legs or extend plays outside of the pocket before striking downfield. May possess packaged play potential with zone-read capabilities on short yardage. Able to generate velocity on intermediate throws. Kept a clean sheet on his short passing attempts with 10 touchdowns and no interceptions.
Weaknesses
One of the least accurate starting quarterbacks in college last season. Operates in the pocket with an excessively wide base as a passer. Has an elongated pitcher's windup and his arm slot drops down slightly below a three-quarter release. Location of his throws is a coin-flipper from snap to snap. Struggles mightily to attack outside the hashes. Lacks anticipation as a passer and allows defensive backs to close out throwing windows.
Bottom Line
Knight is a tough guy and a very capable runner, but he's never thrown with any functional accuracy and he doesn't have the anticipation and delivery quickness necessary. Knight is a longshot to make an NFL roster.
link from delzjc in another thread
http://draftbreakdown.com/video/trevor-knight-vs-auburn-2016/
Please TMC,
Rudy is short and slow. Walker is a bit faster and better suited for coverage.
How's Phillip Rivers doing? IF you remember you felt he was a bust, I felt he would be a very good NFL Player.
Guess who was correct?
<<<<<
At least you got Awuzie correct. Would love to have him. But Leggett? LAZY.
TMC,
Any thoughts on Connor Harris? I know he's from a small Div II school with a lower competition level, but he was a tackling machine all three downs with a high motor that constantly was running. He has the quicks to cover backs and TE/slot receivers too. Just I think he may have difficulty getting washed out by the bigger linemen in the pro''s. From the film I've seen, reminds me of Sam Mills...lots of heart and tenacity in that small frame.
Late round flyer or UDFA? I think he was in the top 10 class of ILBs....could be used as one of those 3rd down moneybackers you speak about.
Coach anyone can be right on one pick. TMC never laid claim that he would be right on them all.
So I wouldn't chest thump too much if I was you.
what a douche.
You want to play hindsight? how was that Sean Davis prediction of you? or that Polamalu prediction for that matter? You also said Burns would suck.
I bet there are a lot more examples of your "scouting" abilities
TC felt Rivers would be out of the NFL in three years. He's a good writer, but he'll miss a lot more than you might think.
I think Walker would make a fine 3rd round pick, and he's projected to go in round 3. He says round 4.
Don't get me wrong I'm glad he's back.
TC felt Rivers would be out of the NFL in three years. He's a good writer, but he'll miss a lot more than you might think.
I think Walker would make a fine 3rd round pick, and he's projected to go in round 3. He says round 4.
Don't get me wrong I'm glad he's back.
Please TMC,
Rudy is short and slow. Walker is a bit faster and better suited for coverage.
How's Phillip Rivers doing? IF you remember you felt he was a bust, I felt he would be a very good NFL Player.
Guess who was correct?
<<<<<
At least you got Awuzie correct. Would love to have him. But Leggett? LAZY.
TMC, What are your views on Tanoh Kpassagnon, DE, Villanova and Vince Biegel, OLB, Wisconsin? Would you be be happy taking them in the Steelers' second and fourth rounds, respectively?
So, Matakevich is short at 6000 but Walker isn't at 6005. A half an inch. Same weight. Walker is 0.16 faster in the 40. Bench almost identical as is the cone and VJ. Shuttle is the same. Walker has him in the broad jump. Statistically, Matakavich kills him when comparing college numbers. Matakavich had 493 career tackles to Walker's 276. He never had less than 101 tackles in a season. In his final season, he had 138 tackles, 5 INTs, and 5 PDs. Walker had 105 tackles, 1 INT, and 5 PD.
As for Rivers, I had him as a 2nd round guy, hated his throwing motion. Hated it. Guess what, still won't give you a first for him. You had him rated very highly, above Ben IIRC. Sorry, I'll still take Ben and Eli over Rivers. But, you can have your stats and no rings. What about Polamalu's head? What about Sean Davis being a bust or Burns for that matter? What about your love for Randy Gregory? You wanted him in the first round. How is that one working out for you?
Yeah, I know I have Awuzie correct, had him correct in January prior to everyone else pimping him and him finally hitting your radar, once Mayock threw him on a list. And, if you knew ANYTHING about Leggett, you would know that the lazy talk came out of his mouth and he was referring to how he approached the game as a freshman/sophomore. You would also know that his coaches praised him since, said he came with a different attitude, leadership, mentality and was a big reason why they became the team they did. They called him a stabilizing force and a great teacher to those young players. But, you wouldn't know that because nobody has told you that yet so you can run other places and parrot it. Just keep this in mind, if I want your opinion, I can read it from NFL.com, where they usually originate.
TMC,not that you need defended, but just ignore Coach. Most on this board, probably 99% on this board would rather read/converse with dialogue from your observations than feed Coach's agenda filled opinions and then have to listen to his arguing about such agendas.
I do not condone nor respect the *** kissing of fellow message board posters like many here do. But that being said, what sense does it make to go back years (decades?) of draft predictions to cherry pick one or two someone may have gotten wrong to discredit a person's work? I have far more respect for someone who endlessly breaks down tape and studies the intricacies of every prospect and develops opinions only to be wrong every once in a while, than I do for the guy sitting on the sidelines pointing it out.
Besides, if the draft and talent evaluation were an exact science, sports (hell the whole world) would be an entirely different landscape. It's impossible to put in the amount of work studying all these prospects as TMC does and be spot on with future predictions for everyone every single time. It's really bizarre to think that a couple cherry-picked examples somehow undoes all of that.
The steelers have been removing the NT when they go nickel, so they have needed two 3 down ILBs. But with them letting Timmons leave, i think it will now be the ILB who comes off for the extra DB. If that's the case then i think they are fine with Williams or Matakevich playing next to Shazier on run downs.
The only ILB i like is the kid from Vanderbilt, who would have to be the 1st round pick. All the rest are guys like Boulware from Clemson or Bullough from Mich State, who are like Matakevich and can be had late.